Article | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research | Resilience and Complexity: Conjoining the Discourses of Two Contested Concepts

Resilience and Complexity: Conjoining the Discourses of Two Contested Concepts
Rasmus Dahlberg: Copenhagen Center for Disaster Research (COPE), Copenhagen University, Denmark
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Theme: Cultures of Disasters Edited by Anders Ekström and Kyrre Kverndokk
No. of pages:
Publication type:

This paper explores two key concepts: resilience and complexity. The first is understood as an emergent property of the latter, and their inter-relatedness is discussed using a three tier approach. First, by exploring the discourse of each concept, next, by analyzing underlying relationships and, finally, by presenting the Cynefin Framework for Sense-Making as a tool of explicatory potential that has already shown its usefulness in several contexts. I further emphasize linking the two concepts into a common and, hopefully, useful concept. Furthermore, I argue that a resilient system is not merely robust. Robustness is a property of simple or complicated systems characterized by predictable behavior, enabling the system to bounce back to its normal state following a perturbation. Resilience, however, is an emergent property of complex adaptive systems. It is suggested that this distinction is important when designing and managing socio-technological and socio-economic systems with the ability to recover from sudden impact.

Keywords: Resilience; robustness; complexity; emergency management; Cynefin Framework.

Volume 7, Theme: Theme: Cultures of Disasters Edited by Anders Ekström and Kyrre Kverndokk, Article 11, 2015

Rasmus Dahlberg
Resilience and Complexity: Conjoining the Discourses of Two Contested Concepts:
  • Adger, W. Neil (2000): ‘Social and ecological resilience: are they related?’ Progress in Human Geography 24, 3, 347-364. DOI: 10.1191/030913200701540465
  • Alexander, David (2013): ‘Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey’, Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences Discussions, 13, 2707-2716. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
  • Aven, Terje (2014: Risk, Surprices and Black Swans: Fundamental Ideas and Concepts in Risk As-sessment and Risk Management, London: Routledge.
  • Brand, Fridolin Simon & Kurt Jax (2007): ‘Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object’, Ecology and Society, 12(1): 23.
  • Cabinet Office (2011): Strategic National Framework on Community Resilience.
  • Dahlberg, Rasmus (2013a): ‘What is resilience – and does it bounce?’ ESRA Newsletter, December, 2-3.
  • Dahlberg, Rasmus (2013b): Katastrofer under 100 ĂĄr, Lund: Historiska Media.
  • Dahlberg, Rasmus, Christine Tind Johannessen-Henry, Emmanuel Raju & Suhella Tulsiani (2015): ‘Resilience in disaster research: three versions’, Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 32:1-2, 44-54. DOI: 10.1080/10286608.2015.1025064
  • Davoudi, Simin (2012): ‘Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End?’ Planning Theory & Practice, 13 (2), 299-333. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
  • Dekker, Sidney, Paul Cilliers & Jan-Hendrik Hofmeyr (2011): ‘The complexity of failure: Implications of complexity theory for safety investigations’, Safety Science,49, 939-945. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.01.008
  • Evans, Brad & Julian Reid (2014): Resilient Life. The Art of Living Dangerously, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • European Commission (2014): Overview of natural and man-made disaster risks in the EU, Commission Staff Working Document. (Ac-cessed March 16, 2015)
  • Folke, Carl (2006): ‘Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses’, Global Environmental Change, 16, 253-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
  • Freudenburg, Willham R. & Robert Gramling (2011): Blowout in the Gulf. The BP Oil Spill Disaster and the Future of Energy in America, Boston: MIT Press.
  • Jarvis, Darryl S.L. (2011): ‘Theorising Risk and Uncertainty in International Relations: The Contri-butions of Frank Knight’, International Relations, 25 (3), 296-312. DOI: 10.1177/0047117811415485
  • Hayes, Brian (2007): ‘Fat Tails’, American Scientist, 95 (3), 200-04. DOI: 10.1511/2007.65.374
  • Heylighen, Francis, Paul Cilliers & Carlos Gershenson (2007): Philosophy and Complexity’, in: Bogg & Geyer (eds.): Complexity, science and society, Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
  • Holling, Crawford Stanley (1973): ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems’, Annual Reviews of Ecological Systems, 4, 1–23. DOI: 10.1146/
  • Holling, Crawford Stanley (1996): ‘Engineering resilience versus Ecological Resilience.’ In: Engineering Within Ecological Constraints, Peter C. Schultz (ed.), Washington, DC: National Acad-emy of Engineering, National Academy Press.
  • Hollnagel, Erik, David D. Woods & Nancy Leveson (eds.) (2006): Resilience Engineering. Concepts and Precepts, Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Hollnagel, Erik, Jean Pariès, David D. Woods & John Wreathall (eds.) (2011): Resilience Engineering in Practice. A guidebook, Farnham: Ashgate.
  • GallopĂ­n, Gilberto C. (2006): ‘Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity’, Global Environmental Change, 16, 293-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
  • Kolar, Katarina (2011): ‘Resilience: Revisiting the Concept and its Utility for Social Research’, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 9, 421-433. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-011-9329-2
  • Kupers, Roland (2014): Turbulence. A Corporate Perspective on Collaborating for Resilience, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Kurtz, Cynthia F. & David J. Snowden (2003): ‘The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world’, IBM Systems Journal, 42 (3), 462-83. DOI: 10.1147/sj.423.0462
  • National Research Council (2007): New Directions for Understanding Systemic Risk, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (2012): Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Perrow, Charles (1999): Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Reason, James (1990): Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139062367
  • Renaud, Cynthia (2012): ‘The Missing Piece of NIMS: Teaching Incident Commanders How to Function in the Edge of Chaos’, Homeland Security Affairs, 8 (June).
  • Rodin, Judith (2015): The Resilience Dividend: Managing disruption, avoiding disaster, and growing stronger in an unpredictable world. London: Profile Books.
  • Snowden, David J. (2005): ‘Strategy in the context of uncertainty’, Handbook of Business Strategy, 47-55. DOI: 10.1108/08944310510556955
  • Snowden, David J. & Mary E. Boone (2007): ‘A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making’, Har-vard Business Review, November.
  • Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2007): The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, New York: Random House.
  • Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2012): Antifragile. Things That Gain from Disorder, New York: Random House.
  • Tierney, Kathleen (2014): The Social Roots of Risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Ungar, Michael (2011): ‘Community resilience for youth and families: Facilitative physical and social capital in contexts of adversity’, Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1742-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.027
  • Walker, Jeremy & Melinda Cooper (2011): ‘Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation’, Security Dialogue, 42(2), 143-160. DOI: 10.1177/0967010611399616
  • Weick, Karl & Karen Sutcliffe (2007): Managing the Unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, 2nd edition, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • World Bank (2008): Climate Resilient Cities, Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Volume 7, Theme:: Theme: Cultures of Disasters Edited by Anders Ekström and Kyrre Kverndokk, Article 11, 2015

    Rasmus Dahlberg
    Resilience and Complexity: Conjoining the Discourses of Two Contested Concepts:
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
  • Maria S.Q. Domingues, Adelina L.F. Baptist & Miguel Tato Diogo (2017). Engineering complex systems applied to risk management in the mining industry. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 27(4): 611. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.05.007

    Export in BibTex, RIS or text