Article | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research | Reconceptualising Well-being: Social Work, Economics and Choice

Title:
Reconceptualising Well-being: Social Work, Economics and Choice
Author:
Graeme Simpson: Social Work, University of Wolverhampton, UK Ani Murr: Social Work, University of Wolverhampton, UK
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146891
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2014
Volume:
6
Theme:
Theme: Therapeutic Cultures Edited by Allan Apperley, Stephen Jacobs & Mark Jones

Pages:
891-904
No. of pages:
14
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2014-10-01


In this paper we examine the intersection of well-being, agency and the current political and economic structures which impact on social work with adults and in doing so contribute to ‘interpreting and mapping out the force fields of meaning production’ (Fornäs, Fredriksson & Johannisson 2011: 7). In it we draw upon Sointu’s (2005) work which identified the shift from conceptualising well-being in terms of ‘the body politic’ to conceptualising it in terms of ‘the body personal’ and identified parallels with understanding well-being in English social work. There has been a shift in the nature of social work in the United Kingdom in how the question of agency has been addressed. For many years this was through the traditional notion of autonomy and self-determination (Biestek 1961) and later collective approaches to welfare and services (Bailey & Brake 1975). The development of paradigms of mainly personal empowerment in the 1980s and 1990s (Braye & Preston-Shoot 1995) saw social work become less associated with collective engagement in welfare and more concerned with the enhancement of individual well-being (Jordan 2007). Whilst the rhetoric of well-being, in contemporary English social work, continues to include autonomy and self-determination, this is focused primarily upon the narrower concepts of independence and choice (Simpson 2012).

The UK Department of Health’s A Vision for Adult Social Care: Capable Communities and Active Citizens (DoH 2010) is the template for national social care policy to which all Local Authorities in England had to respond with an implementation plan. This paper draws on a documentary analysis of two such plans drafted in 2012 in the wake of an ‘austerity budget’ and consequent public expenditure reductions. The analysis considers the effect of economic imperatives on the conceptualisation of individual choices and needs in the context of Local Authorities’ responsibilities to people collectively. A concept of ‘reasonableness’ emerges, which is used to legitimize a re-balancing of the ‘body personal’ and the ‘body politic’ in the concept of well-being with the re-emergence of an economic, public construction. Our discussion considers why this is happening and whether or not a new synthesised position between the personal and political is being developed, as economists and policy makers appropriate well-being for their ends.

Keywords: Well-being; wellbeing; social work; choice; neo-liberalism; adult social care; austerity

Volume 6, Theme: Theme: Therapeutic Cultures Edited by Allan Apperley, Stephen Jacobs & Mark Jones

, Article 48, 2014

Author:
Graeme Simpson, Ani Murr
Title:
Reconceptualising Well-being: Social Work, Economics and Choice:
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146891
References:
  • Attlee, Clement R. (1920): The Social Worker, London. G. Bell and Sons: https://archive.org/details/socialworker00attliala (accessed 11 December 2013).
  • Bailey, Roy & Mike Brake (1975): ‘Social Work and the Welfare State’, Roy Bailey & Mike Brake (eds): Radical Social Work, London: Edward Arnold.
  • Benton, Ted & Ian Craib (2001): Philosophy of Social Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave
  • Beresford, Peter & Sarah Carr (2012): Social Care, Service Users and User Involvement (Research Highlights in Social Work Series), London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Biestek, Felix P. (1961): The Casework Relationship, London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Braye, Suzy & Michael Preston-Shoot (1995): Empowering Practice in Social Care,Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Callinicos, Alex (2004): Making History: Agency, Structure and Change in Social Theory, 2nd Edition. London: Brill.
  • Cockerham, William C. (2005): ‘Health Lifestyle Theory and the Convergence of Agency and Structure’, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46:1, 51–67. DOI: 10.1177/002214650504600105
  • Cummins, Robert A. (2005): ‘Caregivers as Managers of Subjective Wellbeing: A Homeostatic Perspective’, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18:4, 335–344. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00267.x
  • Dalrymple, Jane & Beverley Burke (1995): Anti-Oppressive Practice, Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Department of Health (2010): A Vision for Adult Social Care: Capable Communities and Active Citizens, London: The Stationery Office.
  • Disabled People Against Cuts (2013): http://dpac.uk.net/ (accessed: 06 July 2013).
  • Duffy, Simon (2010). Citizenship & Community, Sheffield: Centre for Welfare Reform.
  • Duncan Smith, Iain (2011): Families and Young People in Troubled Neighbourhoods, Speech delivered at the London School of Economics, 2nd December, 2011: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/newsroom/ministers-speeches/2011/02-12-11.shtml (accessed 03 July 2012).
  • Ereaut, Gill & Rebecca Whiting (2008): What do we Mean by ‘Wellbeing’? And why Might it Matter?, Research Report No DCSF_RW073. Department for Children, Schools and Families.
  • Ferguson, Iain (2007): ‘Increasing User Choice or Privatizing Risk? The Antinomies of Personalization’, British Journal of Social Work, 37:3, 387–403. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm016
  • Ferguson, Iain (2008): Reclaiming Social Work, London. Sage.
  • Fornäs, Johan, Martin Fredriksson & Jenny Johannisson (2011): ‘Editorial’, Culture Unbound, 3, 5-10. 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1135
  • Hall, Stuart (1988): ‘The Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism amongst the Theorists’, Cary Nelson& Lawrence Grossberg (eds): Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Harris, John (2003): The Social Work Business, London: Routledge.
  • Hope, Christopher (2012): ‘The Cabinet is worth £70 million’, The Telegraph, 27 May 2012: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9290520/Exclusive-Cabinet-is-worth-70million.html (accessed 21 May 2014).
  • Houston, Stan. (2010): ‘Beyond Homo Economicus: Recognition, Self-Realization and Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work, 40:3, 841–857. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn132
  • Howe, David (2009): A Brief Introduction to Social Work Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Jones, Chris & Tony Novak (1993): ‘Social Work Today’, British Journal of Social Work, 23:3, 195-212.
  • Jordan, Bill (2008): Welfare and Well-being: Social Value in Public Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Jordan, Bill (2007): Social Work and Well-being, Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.
  • Kirmayer, Laurence J. (1988): ‘Mind and Body as Metaphors: Hidden Values in Biomedicine’, Margaret Lock Deborah Gordon (eds.): Biomedicine Examined, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Langan, Mary (2002): The Legacy of Radical Social Work, London: Macmillan.
  • Le Grand, Julian (2007): The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services Through Choice and Competition, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Lymbery, Mark (2012): ‘Social Work and Personalisation’, British Journal of Social Work, 42:4, 783-792. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs027
  • New Economics Foundation [NEF] (2008): National Accounts of Well-being: http://www.nationalaccountsofwellbeing.org/public-data/files/national-accounts-of-well-being-report.pdf (accessed 14 February 2013).
  • Office for National Statistics (2012): Measuring Subjective Wellbeing in the UK: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171766_272294.pdf (accessed 14 February 2103).
  • Price, Vicky & Graeme Simpson (2007): Transforming Society? Social Work and Sociology, Bristol. The Policy Press.
  • Robson, Colin (2002): Real World Research, Oxford: Wiley and Sons.
  • Schalock, Robert L. (2004): ‘The Concept of Quality of Life: What we Know and do not Know’, Keynote address: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48:3, 203-216. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x
  • Scull, Andrew T. (1983): Decarceration: Community Treatment and the Individual – A Radical View, New York, NY: Rutgers University Press.
  • Simpson, Graeme (2012): ‘Developing Wellbeing as a Critical Tool in Social Work Education: An Example from the Field of Learning Disability’, Social Work Education, 31:5, 622–636. DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2011.605619
  • Simpson, Graeme & Stuart Connor (2011): Social Policy for Social Welfare Professionals: Tools for Understanding, Analysis and Engagement, Bristol. Policy Press.
  • Simpson, Graeme & Vicky Price (2010): ‘From Inclusion to Exclusion: Some Unintended Consequences of “Valuing People”’, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38:3, 180-187. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00572.x
  • Social Work Action Network (2013): http://www.socialworkfuture.org/ (accessed 06 May 2013).
  • Sointu, Eeva (2005): ‘The Rise of an Ideal: Tracing Changing Discourses of Wellbeing’, The Sociological Review, 53:2, 255-274. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00513.x
  • Sointu, Eeva (2011): ‘Detraditionalisation, Gender and Alternative and Complementary Medicines’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 33:3, 356-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01275.x
  • Taylor-Gooby, Peter (2008): ‘Assumptive Worlds and Images of Agency: Academic Social Policy in the Twenty-first Century?’, Social Policy and Society, 7:3, 269-80. DOI: 10.1017/S1474746408004259
  • Wilkinson, Richard & Kate Pickett (2010): The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better For Everyone, London: Penguin Books.
  • Volume 6, Theme:: Theme: Therapeutic Cultures Edited by Allan Apperley, Stephen Jacobs & Mark Jones

    , Article 48, 2014

    Author:
    Graeme Simpson, Ani Murr
    Title:
    Reconceptualising Well-being: Social Work, Economics and Choice:
    DOI:
    10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146891
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
    Citations:
    No citations available at the moment
     

    Export in BibTex, RIS or text