Article | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research | What Future for Traditional Encyclopedias in the Age of Wikipedia?

Title:
What Future for Traditional Encyclopedias in the Age of Wikipedia?
Author:
Michael Upshall: United Kingdom
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146641
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2014
Volume:
6
Theme:

Tales from the field

Pages:
641-646
No. of pages:
5
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2014-06-17


The launch and rapid domination of Wikipedia as a reference tool for the Internet was as dramatic as it was unexpected. Wikipedia broke so many of the rules of reference publishing, which, even if not formally codified, had been widely accepted for many years: the use of (usually named) authorities as expert contributors, and the presence of moderating editors to ensure balanced structure. All this appeared to have been swept away with Wikipedia, and, not least because Wikipedia content is given away rather than sold, the competition between Wikipedia and most general-purpose encyclopedias was a sad and rather one-sided affair. One by one the existing commercial print general encyclopedias admitted defeat; among the latest is Brockhaus, the leading German encyclopedia brand, which ended publication early in 2013.

Volume 6, Theme:

Tales from the field

, Article 35, 2014
Author:
Michael Upshall
Title:
What Future for Traditional Encyclopedias in the Age of Wikipedia?:
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146641
References:
  • Cambridge Semantics (2014): Introduction to the Semantic Web, http://www.cambridgesemantics.com/semantic-university/introduction-to-the-semantic-we (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Meyer, Robinson (2012): ‘3 Charts That Show How Wikipedia Is Running Out of Admins’, The Atlantic, 16 July 2012: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/3-charts-that-show-how-wikipedia-is-running-out-of-admins/259829/ (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Wikipedia (2013): Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce, 4 November 2013: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Cleanup_Taskforce&oldid=580212744 (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Wikipedia (2014a): Antonín Dvořák, 1 March 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton%C3%ADn_Dvo%C5%99%C3%A1k&oldid=597598579 (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Wikipedia (2014b): Criticism of Wikipedia, 2 March 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Wikipedia&oldid=597782558 (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Wikipedia (2014c): Johann Sebastian Bach, 21 February 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johann_Sebastian_Bach&oldid=596528313 (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Wikipedia (2014d): Wikipedia:About, 15 February 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:About&oldid=595597162 (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Wikipedia (2014e): Wikipedia:Notability, 25 February 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Notability&oldid=597077149 (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Wikipedia (2014f): Wikipedia:Statistics, 1 March 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Statistics&oldid=597672528 (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Wilkinson, Dennis M. & Huberman, Bernardo A. (2007): Assessing the Value of Cooperation in Wikipedia: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0702140 (accessed 3 March 2014).
  • Volume 6, Theme::

    Tales from the field

    , Article 35, 2014
    Author:
    Michael Upshall
    Title:
    What Future for Traditional Encyclopedias in the Age of Wikipedia?:
    DOI:
    10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146641
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
    Citations:
    No citations available at the moment
     

    Export in BibTex, RIS or text