Article | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research | Standardized Flexibility: The Choreography of ICT in Standardization of Service Work

Title:
Standardized Flexibility: The Choreography of ICT in Standardization of Service Work
Author:
Maria Røhnebæk: Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, The University of Oslo, Norway
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124679
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2012
Volume:
4
Theme:
Theme: Objectification, Measurement and Standardization Edited by Tord Larsen

Pages:
679-698
No. of pages:
20
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2013-01-24


This article is based on a research project that explores the proliferation of information and communication technology (ICT) in public services. Furthermore, the research explores how the enhanced presence of ICT relates to efforts to increas-ingly individualise the service delivery. It can be argued that enhanced individualisation requires increased levels of discretion and flexibility. At the same time, this flexibility needs to be implemented within a standardized framework to ensure due process and to meet demands for efficiency. As local-level work practices in the public services are increasingly being enabled through ICT, the information systems can thus be seen to offer ’standardized flexibility’. Hence, the information systems work as both enablers of flexibility and as controllers of the same.

This research explores how this duality manifests empirically at the local-level of the Norwegian employment and welfare services (NAV). It focuses on the in-terface of the information systems and local-level employees. In this article, I portray the role of the information system, Arena, with regard to how the front-line employees structure and organize their work. This portrayal reveals that the information system reflects an ideal world which is out of tune with local working conditions. The employees are thus facing gaps between the ideals of the system and their actual work context. The main purpose of the paper is to illustrate how the employees deal with this gap; I identify three types of responses and strategies. Moreover, I suggest that the relationship between the information systems and different kinds of local responses may be fruitfully analysed by drawing an analogy with choreography and dancing. The second purpose of this article is thus to outline how the metaphor of choreography may provide a suitable theoretical lens for analysing ICT-enabled standardization of work.

Keywords: ICT; Welfare Services; Standardization; Flexibility; Tinkering; Choreography

Volume 4, Theme: Theme: Objectification, Measurement and Standardization Edited by Tord Larsen

, Article 37, 2012

Author:
Maria Røhnebæk
Title:
Standardized Flexibility: The Choreography of ICT in Standardization of Service Work:
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124679
References:
  • Akrich, Madeline (1992): ‘The De-scription of Technical Objects’, Wiebe, E. Bijker & John Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • Bowker, Geoffrey. C., & Susan L. Star (2000): Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • Brunsson, Nils, Andreas Rasche & David Seidl (2012): ‘The Dynamics of Standardization: Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies’, Organization Studies, 33:5-6, 613-632.
  • iborra, Claudio, U. (1992): ‘From Thinking to Tinkering: The Grassroots of Strategic Information Systems’, The Information Society, 8(4), 297-309.
  • Cussins, Charis (1996): ‘Ontological Choreography: Agency through Objectification in Infertility Clinics’, Social Studies of Science, 26(3), 575-610.
  • Czarniawska, Barbara (1999): Writing Management: Organization Theory as a Literary Genre, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Czarniawska, Barbara (2007): Shadowing and Other Techniques for doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies, Malmö: Liber.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow & Jane Tinkler (2006): ‘New Public Management is Dead-long Live Digital-era Governance’, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 16:3. 467-494.
  • Ellingsen, Gunnar, Eric Monteiro & Glenn Munkvold (2007): ‘Standardization of Work: Co-constructed Practice’, Information Society, 23:5, 309-326.
  • Hvinden, Bjørn (1994): Divided Against Itself: A Study of Integration in Welfare Bureaucracy, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
  • Kernaghan, Kenneth (2005): ‘Moving Towards the Virtual State: Integrating Services and Service Channels for Citizen-centred Delivery", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71:1, 119-131.
  • Latour, Bruno (1987): Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Latour, Bruno (1991): ‘Technology is Society Made Durable’, John Law (ed.): A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge.
  • Law, John (1986): ‘On the Methods of Long-distance Control: Vessels Navigation and the Portuguese route to India", John Law (ed.): Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 234-263.
  • Ling, Tom (2002): ‘Delivering Joinedup Government in the UK: Dimensions, Issues and Problems’, Public Administration, 80:4, 615-642.
  • Ministry of Labour and Social Services (2005): Stortingsproposisjon 46, Ny arbeids og velferdsforvaltning.
  • Ministry of Social Services (2004): NOU 2004: 13 En ny arbeids- og velferdsforvaltning - Om samordning av Aetats, trygdeetatens og sosialtjenestens oppgaver.
  • Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser & Jeannette Pols (2010): Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
  • Monteiro, Eric & Knut H. Rolland (2012): ‘Trans-situated Use of Integrated Information Systems’, European Journal of Information Systems 20:3.
  • Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Susan V. Scott (2008): ‘Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization’, The Academy of Management Annals, 2:1, 433-474.
  • Pollitt, Christopher (2003): ‘Joined-up Government: a Survey’, Political Studies Review, 1:1, 34-49.
  • Suchman, Lucy. A. (2007): Human-machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Timmermans, Stefan & Marc Berg (1997): ‘Standardization in Action: Achieving Local Universality through Medical Protocols’, Social Studies of Science, 27:2, 273-305.
  • Woolgar, Steve (1991): ‘Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials’, John Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge.
  • Volume 4, Theme:: Theme: Objectification, Measurement and Standardization Edited by Tord Larsen

    , Article 37, 2012

    Author:
    Maria Røhnebæk
    Title:
    Standardized Flexibility: The Choreography of ICT in Standardization of Service Work:
    DOI:
    10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124679
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
    Citations:
    No citations available at the moment
     

    Export in BibTex, RIS or text