Article | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research | Sound Objects and Sound Products: Standardizing a New Culture of Listening in the First Half of the Twentieth Century

Title:
Sound Objects and Sound Products: Standardizing a New Culture of Listening in the First Half of the Twentieth Century
Author:
Alexandra Hui: University of California, Los Angeles, USA
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124599
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2012
Volume:
4
Theme:
Theme: Objectification, Measurement and Standardization Edited by Tord Larsen

Pages:
599-616
No. of pages:
18
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2013-01-24


In this chapter I develop the psychological underpinnings of environmental music towards an understanding of how the goals of cognitive and behavioral psychologists contributed to a new kind of listening at the beginning of the twentieth century. I begin with an examination of nineteenth-century concerns about both the physical and psychological effects of music and fraught debate among experimental psychologists of the role of musical expertise in the laboratory. These concerns were, I argue, rooted in the assumption of a direct, corporeal connection between the generation and reception of music, usually bound within a single, individual body. In the twentieth century, new technology liberated the listener from a temporally- and geographically-bound experience of music. The Tone Tests, Re-Creation Recitals, and Mood Change “parties” of Thomas Edison and the psychologist Walter Bingham show that recording technology allowed for a normalization and standardization of listening not previously possible in the music halls and laboratories of the nineteenth century. Rather paradoxically, since it also made music more accessible to the individual listener, recorded music, mobilized by industrial psychologists and record companies alike, created a new sound experience actively designed for the lowest common denominator of mass listening. It also contributed to the cultivation of a new practice of mass listening. The new mass listening practice presents broader questions about the definition of music and its functional role – If the function of music is to be ignored, is it still music?

Keywords: Tone Test; Mood Change; Standardization of Listening; Walter Bingham; Edison Phonograph

Volume 4, Theme: Theme: Objectification, Measurement and Standardization Edited by Tord Larsen

, Article 33, 2012

Author:
Alexandra Hui
Title:
Sound Objects and Sound Products: Standardizing a New Culture of Listening in the First Half of the Twentieth Century:
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124599
References:
  • Bingham, Walter (1910): “Studies in Melody”, The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 12:3.
  • Bingham, Walter (1927/2001): “Introduction”, Max Schoen (ed.): The Effects of Music: A Series of Essays, edited by Max Schoen, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co, 1-9. Reprinted by Routledge in 1999 and 2001.
  • Bjisterveld, Karin (2008): Mechanical Sound: Technology, Culture, and Public Problems of Noise in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
  • Botstein, Leon (1990): “Time and Memory: Concert Life, Science, and Music in Brahms’s Vienna”, Walter Frisch (ed.), Brahms and his World, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Bücher, Karl (1899): Arbeit und Rhythmus, Leipzig: Teubner.
  • Bücher (1893/1907): Industrial Evolution, translated from 3rd German edition by S. Morely Wickett, New York: Henry Holt and Company.
  • Hanslick, Eduard (1854/1957) The Beautiful in Music, edited by Morris Weitz and translated from the 7th German edition by Gustav Cohen, New York: Liberal Arts Press.
  • Hui, Alexandra (2011): “Instruments of Music, Instruments of Science: Hermann von Helmholtz’s Sound Sensation Studies, his Classicism, and his Beethoven Sonata”, Annals of Science, 68:2, 149-177.
  • Hui, Alexandra (2012a): “The Bias of ‘Music-Infected Consciousness’: the Aesthetics of Listening in the Laboratory and on the City Streets of Fin-de-Siècle Berlin and Vienna”, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28:3, 236-250.
  • Hui, Alexandra (2012b): The Psychophysical Ear: Musical Experiments, Experimental Sounds, 1840-1910, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
  • Jackson, Myles (2006): Harmonious Triads: Physicists, Musicians, and Instrument Makers in Nineteenth-Century Germany, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
  • Johnson, James (1995): Listening in Paris: a Cultural History, Berkeley: The University of California Press.
  • Kennaway, James (2010): “From Sensibility to Pathology: The Origins of the Idea of Nervous Music Around 1800”, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 65, 396-426.
  • Lipps, Theodor (1902): “Zur Theorie der Melodie”, Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 27, 225-263.
  • Lipps, Theodor (1905): Psychologische Studien, 2nd ed. Leipzig: Verlag der Dürr’schen Buchhandlung.
  • Lorenz, Carl (1890): “Untersuchungen über die Auffassung von Tondistanzen”, Philosophische Studien, 6, 26-103.
  • Meyer, Max (1900): “Elements of a Psychological Theory of Melody,” Psychological Review, 7:3, 241-273.
  • Meyer, Max (1904): “Unscientific Methods in Musical Esthetics”, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1, 707-715.
  • Milner, Greg, (2007): Perfecting Sound Forever: An Aural History of Recorded Music, New York: Faber & Faber.
  • Myers, Charles (1927): “Individual Differences in Listening to Music”, Max Schoen (ed.). The Effects of Music, New York: Routledge, 10-37.
  • Ortmann, Otto (1927): “Types of Listeners: Genetic Considerations”, Max Schoen (ed.): The Effects of Music, New York: Routledge, 38-77.
  • Pinch, Trevor & Karin Bijsterveld, (2003): “Should One Applaud? Breaches and Boundaries in the Reception of New Technology in Music”, Technology and Culture, 22, 536-559.
  • Pinch, Trevor and Frank Trocco, (2002): Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
  • Schafer, R. Murray (1977/1994): The Tuning of the World: Toward a Theory of Soundscape Design, New York: Knopf. When reprinted in 1994, retitled to The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World.
  • Sterne, Jonathan, (2003): The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction, Durham, North Carolina, Duke University Press.
  • Stumpf, Carl (1888): “W. Wundt, Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie; E. Luft, Über die Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit für Tonhöhern”, Vierteljahrsschrift für Musikwissenschaft, 4, 540-550.
  • Stumpf, Carl (1890): “Über Vergleichungen von Tondistanzen”, Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinneorgane, 1, 419-462.
  • Stumpf, Carl (1891): “Wundt’s Antikritik”, Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 2, 266-293.
  • Thompson, Emily (1995): “Machines, Music, and the Quest for Fidelity: Marketing the Edison Phonograph, 1877-1925”, The Musical Quarterly, 29:1, 131-171.
  • Stumpf, Carl (2002): The Soundscape of Modernity: Architectural Acoustics and the Culture of Listening in America, 1900-1933, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
  • Weber, William (1975): Music and the Middle Class: The Social Structure of Concert Life in London, Paris and Vienna, New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers.
  • Weinmann, Fritz (1904): “Zur Struktur der Melodie”, Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 38, 238-239.
  • Wundt, Wilhelm (1891): “Ueber Vergleichungen von Tondistanzen”, Philosophische Studien, 6, 616-617.
  • Ziemer, Hansjakob (2008): Die Moderne hören: Das Konzert als urbanes Forum 1890-1940, Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
  • Volume 4, Theme:: Theme: Objectification, Measurement and Standardization Edited by Tord Larsen

    , Article 33, 2012

    Author:
    Alexandra Hui
    Title:
    Sound Objects and Sound Products: Standardizing a New Culture of Listening in the First Half of the Twentieth Century:
    DOI:
    10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124599
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
    Citations:
    No citations available at the moment
     

    Export in BibTex, RIS or text