Article | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research | Beyond Capitalist Realism – Why We Need Critical Future Studies

Title:
Beyond Capitalist Realism – Why We Need Critical Future Studies
Author:
Luke Goode: School of Social Sciences, University of Auckland, Aoteaoroa, New Zealand Michael Godhe: Department for Studies of Social Change and Culture, Campus Norrköping, Linköping University, Sweden
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1790615
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2017
Volume:
9
Issue:
1
Pages:
109-129
No. of pages:
22
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2017-06-15


This paper introduces the interdisciplinary field of Critical Future Studies (CFS). CFS investigates the scope and constraints within public culture for imagining and debating different potential futures. It interrogates imagined futures founded – often surreptitiously – upon values and assumptions from the past and present, as well as those representing a departure from current social trajectories. CFS draws on perspectives from various disciplines including sociology, political studies, intellectual history, cultural history, media and cultural studies, utopian studies, science and technology studies, and philosophy. CFS also engages with discourses and ideas from the natural sciences (including popular science), computing and economics. And, given our concern with public culture, CFS aims to contribute constructively to vigorous and imaginative public debate about the future – a futural public sphere – and to challenge a prevalent contemporary cynicism about our capacity to imagine alternative futures while trapped in a parlous present. To that extent, we propose CFS as a programme of engaged and open-ended social critique, not as a solely academic endeavour. Our paper begins by describing the relationship between CFS and mainstream Future Studies. Subsequently, we discuss the contemporary context for Critical Future Studies. Here we make the case that CFS is a timely and even urgent project at our current historical juncture, arguing also for the significance of both utopian and dystopian imaginings. We then go on to discuss methodologies within CFS scholarship. Finally, we conclude by reflecting on the values underpinning CFS. Overall, this paper not only describes CFS as a field of research but also serves as an invitation to cultural scholars to consider how their own work might intersect with and contribute to CFS.

Keywords: Critical future studies; utopia; dystopia; realism

Volume 9, Issue: 1, Article 8, 2017

Author:
Luke Goode, Michael Godhe
Title:
Beyond Capitalist Realism – Why We Need Critical Future Studies:
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1790615
References:

Appadurai, Arjun (2013): The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition, London: Verso.

Baccolini, Rafaella and Tom Moylan (eds.) (2003): Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination, New York: Routledge.

Berardi, Franco (2011): After the Future, Oakland, CA: AK Press.

Bradley, Karin and Johan Hedrén (eds) (2014): Green Utopianism: Perspectives, Politics and Micro-Practices, New York: Routledge.

Bregman, Rutger (2016): Utopia for Realists: The Case for a Universal Basic Income, Open Borders, and a 15-hour Workweek, London: Little, Brown Book Group.

Brown, Wendy (1999): “Resisting Left Melancholy”, Boundary 2, 26:3, 19-27.

Castoriadis, Cornelius (1998): The Imaginary Institution of Society, Oxford: Blackwell.

Coole, Diana and Samantha Frost (eds) (2010): New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

de Wilde, Rein (2000): De Vorspeller: Een kritiek op de toekomstindustrie, Amsterdam: de Balie.

Eagleton, Terry (2015): Hope Without Optimism, Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

Fisher, Mark (2009): Capitalist Realism: Is there no Alternative?, Winchester: Zero Books.

Fisher, Mark (2014): Ghosts of My Life: Writings on Depression, Hauntology and Lost Futures, Winchester: Zero Books.

Frase, Peter (2016): Four Futures: Life After Capitalism, London: Verso.

Galtung, Johan and Sohail Inayatullah (eds) (1997): Macrohistory and Macrohistorians: Perspectives on Individual, Social and Civilizational Change, Westport, CT: Praeger Press.

Godhe, Michael (2010): “’Literature of estrangement’: Några linjer i feministisk utopi-och sf-forskning”, Michael Godhe & Jonas Ramsten (eds.): Möjliga världar: Tekniken, vetenskapen och science fiction, Stockholm: Carlssons, 157-178.

Gray, John (2002): Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals, London: Granta.

Harari, Yuval (2011): Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, New York: Harper Collins.

Hylland Eriksen, Thomas (2007): Globalization: The Key Concepts, New York: Berg.

Inayatullah, Sohail (2010): Questioning the Future: Methods and Tools for Organizational and Societal Transformation, Tamsui: Tamkang University Press.

Jameson, Frederic (1982): “Progress versus Utopia, or, Can We Imagine the Future?”, Science Fiction Studies, 9:2, 147-158.

Johansson, Jonas (2006): Du sköna nya tid? Debatten om informationssamhället I Riksdag och Storting under 1990-talet, Linköping: Tema Communication Studies, http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:21704/FULLTEXT01.pdf, (accessed 29/10/16).

Josselson, Ruthellen (2004): “The Hermeneutics of Faith and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion”, Narrative Inquiry, 4:1, 1-28. DOI: 10.1075/ni.14.1.01jos

Kelly, Kevin (2016): The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future, New York: Penguin.

Kurzweil, Ray (2006): The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, New York: Viking.

Levitas, Ruth (2013): Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society, London: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1057/9781137314253

Lovelock, James (2000): Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, Oxford: OUP.

Marx, Leo (1994): “The Idea of ‘Technology’ and Postmodern Pessimism”, Merrit Roe Smith & Leo Marx (eds): Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 237-257. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0876-8_2

Mason, Paul (2013): Why it’s Still Kicking Off Everywhere: The New Global Revolutions, London: Verso.

Morozov, Evgeny (2014): To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism, New York: Perseus Books.

Mosco, Vincent (2004): The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Moyn, Samuel (2014): “Imaginary Intellectual History”, Darrin M McMahon and Samuel Moyn (eds), Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, New York: OUP, 112-130. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199769230.003.0006

Nye, David E. (1994): American Technological Sublime, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pursell, Carroll (2007): Technology in Postwar America: A History, New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: 10.7312/purs12304

Sardar, Ziauddin (2010): “The Namesake: Futures; Future Studies; Futurology; Futuristic; Foresight—What’s in a Name?”, Futures, 42, 177-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.001

Son, Heonju (2015): “The History of Western Future Studies: An Exploration of the Intellectual Traditions and Three-Phase Periodization”, Futures, 66, 120-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.12.013

Srnicek, Nick and Alex Williams (2015): Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work, London: Verso.

Standage, Tom (1998): The Victorian Internet, New York: Bloomsbury.

Steger, Manfred B. (2008), The Rise of the Global Imaginary: Political ideologies from French Revolution to the Global War on Terror, Oxford: OUP.

Taylor, Charles (2002): “Modern Social Imaginaries”, Public Culture, 14:1, 91-124. DOI: 10.1215/08992363-14-1-91

Vint, Sherryl (2016): “Introduction to ‘The Futures Industry’”, Paradoxa, Vol 27, 7-20.

Young, Simon (2005): Designer Evolution: A Transhumanist Manifesto, New York: Prometheus Books.

Volume 9, Issue: 1, Article 8, 2017

Author:
Luke Goode, Michael Godhe
Title:
Beyond Capitalist Realism – Why We Need Critical Future Studies:
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1790615
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment
 

Export in BibTex, RIS or text