Re-scaling Governance in Berlin’s Creative Economy
Bastian Lange: Leibniz-Institute for Regional Geography Leipzig, Germany
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Theme: Creativity Unbound – Policies, Government and the Creative Industries
No. of pages:
Publication type:

The paper aims at discussing the issue of governance in respect to creative scenes, a central structural element of the creative economy, exemplifying the case of Berlin. Berlin has a fast growing creative industry that has become the object of the city’s development policies and place marketing. The core question is: What are the spatial-organizational driving forces of creativity in Berlin - can they be steered by public administration? I am using Berlin as a reference case to articulate the gap between ’stateled planning’ on the one hand and the organisational practices of self-governed creative scenes on the other. I attempt to demonstrate why a perspective change in terms of re-scaling is necessary, in order to respond to the particular practices of emerging industries and their societal form ’scenes’. By re-scaling I mean the conceptualization of governance in different nonhierarchical organisational as well as spatial scales, based on the observation that scenes are considered to be a central element of the functionality of creative industries.

Keywords: Governance; Berlin; Creative Economy; scenes; scale

Volume 3, Theme: Theme: Creativity Unbound – Policies, Government and the Creative Industries, Article 14, 2011

Bastian Lange
Re-scaling Governance in Berlin’s Creative Economy:
  • Abbott, Andrew (1988): The System of Professions, Chicago.
  • Amin, Ash (2004): “’Regions unbound’: Towards a New Politics of Place”, Geografiska Annaler, 86B:1, 33–44.
  • Amin, Ash & Nigel Thrift (2002): Cities: Reimagining the Urban, Cambridge, Polity.
  • Bahrdt, Hans-Paul (1961/2006): Die moderne Großstadt. Soziologische Überlegungen zum Städtebau. Opladen, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Balducci, Alessandro (2004): “Creative Governance in Dynamic City Regions”, DISP:158, 21–26.
  • Balducci, Alessandro, Klaus R. Kunzmann & Francesca S. Sartorio (2004): “Towards creative city region governance in Italy and Germany”, DISP, 1582–1584.
  • Bernt, Matthias (2003): Rübergeklappt. Die‚ Behutsame Stadterneuerung’ im Berlin der 90er Jahre. Berlin: Schelzky & Jeep.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1986): “The Forms of Capital”, John Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research of the Sociology of Education, Westport: Greenwood Press, 241–258.
  • Büttner, Kerstin, Bastian Lange, Petra Jähnke & Ulf Matthiesen (2004): “Zwischen Spardiktat und Exzellenzansprüchen – Wissensstadt Berlin”, DISP, 15675–15687.
  • Cameron, Kim & Quinn, Robert (1988): “Organizational Paradox and Transformation”, Robert. E. Quinn & Kim Cameron (eds), Paradox and Transformation, Cambridge: Harper & Row, 1–18.
  • Davies, Anthony & Ford, Simon (1998): “Art Capital”, Art Monthly, 1:213, 12–20.
  • DeFillippi, Robert, Gernot Grabher & Candace Jones (2007): “Introduction to Paradoxes of Creativity: Managerial and Organizational Challenges in the Cultural Economy”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28:5, 511–521. [Read this article]
  • Ellmeier, Andrea (2003): “Cultural Entrepreneurialism: On the Changing Relationship Between the Arts, Culture and Employment”, The International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9:1, 3–16. [Read this article]
  • Ertel, Rainer (2006): ”Daten und Fakten zur Kulturwirtschaft”, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 34–35, 17–23.
  • Evetts, Julia (2003): “The Sociological Analysis of Professionalism”, International Sociology, 18:1, 395–415. [Read this article]
  • Florida, Richard (2002): “The Rise of the Creative Class - Cities without Gays and Rock Bands are Losing the Economic Development Race”, The Washington Monthly, 34:5, 15–25.
  • Fournier, Valerie (1999): “The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism”, Social Review, 47, 280–307. [Read this article]
  • Freidson, Eliot (2001): Professionalism: The third logic, Cambridge.
  • Friebe, Holm & Sascha Lobo (2006): Wir nennen es Arbeit: die digitale Bohème oder: Intelligentes Leben jenseits der Festanstellung, München: Heyne.
  • Grabher, Gernot (2002a): “Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context”, Regional Studies, 36:3, 205–214. [Read this article]
  • Grabher, Gernot (2002b): “The Project Ecology of Advertising: Tasks, Talents and Teams”, Regional Studies, 36:3, 245–262. [Read this article]
  • Grabher, Gernot (2004): “Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks?: Communality, Sociality, and Connectivity in Project Ecologies”, European Urban and Regional Studies, 11:2, 103–123. [Read this article]
  • Grabher, Gernot (2006): “Trading Routes, Bypasses, and Risky Intersections: Mapping the Travels of ‘Networks’ Between Economic Sociology and Economic Geography”, Progress in Human Geography, 30:2, 1–27.
  • Hadjimichalis, Costis (2006): “Non-economic Factors in Economic Geography and in ‘New Regionalism’: A Sympathetic Critique”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30:3, 690–704. [Read this article]
  • Hadjimichalis, Costis & Dina Vaiou (1990): “Whose Flexibility? The Politics of Informalisation in Southern Europe”, Capital & Class, 42, 79–106. [Read this article]
  • Häußermann, Hartmut & Andreas Kapphan (2002): Berlin: von der geteilten zur gespaltenen Stadt?. Sozialräumlicher Wandel seit 1990. Opladen, Leske + Budrich.
  • Healey, Patsy (2006): “Transforming Governance: Challenges of Institutional Adaptation and a new Politics of Space”, European Planning Studies, 14:3, 299–320. [Read this article]
  • Heinelt, Hubert (2004): “Governance auf lokaler Ebene”, Arthur Benz (ed.), Governance - Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 29–44.
  • Hirsch, Paul (1972): “Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems”, American Journal of Sociology, 77, 639–659. [Read this article]
  • Holm, Andrej (2006): Die Restrukturierung des Raumes. Stadterneuerung der 90er Jahre in Ostberlin: Interessen und Machtverhältnisse, Bielefeld: Transcript.
  • Jessop, B. (1995): “The Regulation Approach, Governance and Post-fordism”, Economy and Society, 24:3, 307–333. [Read this article]
  • Kalandides, Ares (2007): “For a Stricter Use of the Term ‘Gentrification’”, Geographies, 13, 158–172.
  • Kooiman, Jan (2003): Governing as Governance, London: Sage.
  • Kosmala, Katarzyna (2007): “The Identity Paradox? Reflections on Fluid Identity of Female Artist”, Culture and Organization, 13:1, 37–53. [Read this article]
  • Kunzmann, Klaus R. (2004): “An Agenda for Creative Governance in City Regions”, DISP:158, 5–10.
  • Lange, Bastian (2005a): “Landscapes of Cultural Scenes: Socio-spatial Emplacement Strategies of ‘Culturepreneurs’ in Berlin”, Anne-Marie d`Hauteserre & Theano S. Terkenli (eds), Landscape of a New Cultural Economy of Space, Dordrecht: Kluwer Press, 41–67.
  • Lange, Bastian (2005b): “Socio-spatial strategies of Culturepreneurs. The example of Berlin and its new professional scenes”, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie (Special Issue: Ökonomie und Kultur), 49:2, 81–98.
  • Lange, Bastian (2007): Die Räume der Kreativszenen: Culturepreneurs und ihre Orte in Berlin, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
  • Lange, Bastian (2008): “Accessing Markets in Creative Industries: Professionalization and Social-spatial Strategies of Culturepreneurs in Berlin”, Creative Industries Journal, 1:2, 115–135. [Read this article]
  • Lange, Bastian & Ares Kalandides (2008): “Governance of Creative Industries in Berlin – Paradoxes, places, practices”, Helen Wan, Yueng, Erin, Yueng, Theresa (ed.), When Creative Industries Crossover with Cities, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Institute of Planners (HKIP), 122–133.
  • Lange, Bastian & Harald A. Mieg (2008): “Professionalisierungswege und Konstituierungen von ‘Märkten’ in den Creative Industries”, Geographische Zeitschrift, 94:4, 225–242.
  • Lave, Jean (1991): “Situating Learning in Communities of Practice”, John M. Levine & Lauren B. Resnick & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 63–82.
  • Massey, Doreen (2004): “Geographies of Responsibility”, Geografiska Annaler, 86B:1, 5–18.
  • McKinsey (2010): Berlin 2020 - Wirtschaftliche Perspektiven durch neue Wachstumskerne. Berlin. (Report commissioned by the Senat of Berlin).
  • McRobbie, Angela (2002): “Clubs to Companies: Notes on the Decline of Political Culture in Speeded up Creative Worlds”, Cultural Studies, 16:4, 516–531. [Read this article]
  • McRobbie, Angela (2005): ”Wie man in Londons kreativen Kleinunternehmen über die Runden kommt”, Beate Binder & Silke Göttsch & Wolfgang Kaschuba & Konrad Vanja (Eds), Ort–Arbeit–Körper. Ethnografie Europäischer Modernen, Münster: Waxmann, 81–96.
  • Mieg, Harald A. (2008): “Professionalisation”, Felix Rauner & Rupert Maclean (eds), Handbook of Vocational Education Research, Dordrecht: Springer, in press.
  • Neff, Gina & Stark, David (2003): “Permanently beta - Responsive Organisation in the Internet Era”, Howard, Philip E.N. & Steve Jones (eds), The Internet and American Life, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 173–188.
  • Neff, Gina, Elizabeth Wissinger & Sharon Zukin (2005): “Entrepreneurial Labour among Cultural Producers: ‘Cool’ Jobs in ‘Hot’ Industries”, Social Semiotics, 15:3, 307–334. [Read this article]
  • Rae, David (2002): “Entrepreneurial Emergence: A Narrative Study of Entrepreneurial Learning in Independently Owned Media Businesses”, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3:1, 53-60. [Read this article]
  • Rae, David (2004): “Entrepreneurial learning: a practical model from the creative industries”, Education + Training, 46:8/9, 492–500.
  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996): “The New Governance”, Political Studies, 44:4, 652–667. [Read this article]
  • Schrock, Greg & Markusen, Ann (2005): “The Distinctive City: Urban Occupational Specialization and Implications for Development Policy”, Regina Sonnabend & Rolf Stein (eds), The Other Cities, IBA Stadtumbau 2010: Urban Distinctiveness, Berlin/Dessau, Jovis/Edition Bauhaus, xy.
  • Scott, Allen J. (2006): “Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Industrial Development: Geography and the Creative Field Revisited”, Small Business Economics, 26:1, 1–24. [Read this article]
  • Senatsverwaltung für Wirtschaft, Technologie und Frauen (2008): Kulturwirtschaft in Berlin - Entwicklungen und Potenziale (2. Kulturwirtschaftsbericht). Berlin, Senatsverwaltung für Wirtschaft, Technologie und Frauen.
  • Smith, Neil (1979): “Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement of Capital, not People”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 45:4, 583–648. [Read this article]
  • Smith, Neil (2005): The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.
  • Steyaert, Chris & Jerome Katz (2004): “Reclaiming the Space of Entrepreneurship in Society: Geographical, Discursive and Social Dimensions”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16:3, 179–196. [Read this article]
  • Stoker, G. (1998): “Governance as Theory”, International Social Science Journal, 50:155, 17–28. [Read this article]
  • Sydow, Jörg, Lars Lindkvist & Robert Defillippi (2004): “Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial”, Organization Studies, 25:9, 1475–1490. [Read this article]
  • Thelen, Kathleen (2003): “The Paradox of Globalization: Labor Relations in Germany and Beyond”, Comparative Political Studies, 36:8, 859–880. [Read this article]
  • Thomas, Michael (1997): “Voraussetzungsvolle Passagen Neuer Selbständiger im ostdeutschen Transformationsprozeß”, Michael Thomas (ed.), Selbständige – Gründer – Unternehmer, Berlin: Berliner Debatte Wissenschaftsverlag, 14–57.
  • Vaiou, Dina (1997): “Informal Cities? Women’s Work and Informal Activities on the Margins of the European Union”, Roger Lee & Jane Willis (eds), Geographies of Economies, London, New York, Sydney, Auckland: Arnold, 321–330.
  • Wellmann, Inga (2009): “Schnittstellenkulturen - Hybride Akteure, Patchworkökonomien, Intermediäre Institutionen”, Bastian Lange, Ares Kalandides, Birgit Stöber & Inga Wellmann (eds), Governance der Kreativwirtschaft, Bielefeld: Transcript, 183–198.
  • Wenger, Etienne (1999): Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, Harrison C. (2002): Markets from Networks: Socioeconomic Models of Production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Wilson, Nicholas & Stokes, David (2005): “Managing Creativity and Innovation: The Challenge for Cultural Entrepreneurs”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12:3, 366–378. [Read this article]
  • Wittel, Andreas (2001): “Toward a Network Sociality”, Theory, Culture & Society, 18:6, 51–76.
  • Zhang, Xudong (2004): “Multiplicity or Homogeneity? The Cultural-Political Paradox of the Age of Globalization”, Cultural Critique, 58, 30–55. [Read this article]
  • Volume 3, Theme:: Theme: Creativity Unbound – Policies, Government and the Creative Industries, Article 14, 2011

    Bastian Lange
    Re-scaling Governance in Berlin’s Creative Economy:
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
  • Iain Munr & Silvia Jordan (2013). ‘Living Space’ at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe: Spatial tactics and the politics of smooth space. Human Relations, 66(11): 1497. DOI: 10.1177/0018726713480411
  • Pier Luigi Sacc & Alessandro Crociata (2013). A Conceptual Regulatory Framework for the Design and Evaluation of Complex, Participative Cultural Planning Strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5): 1688. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01159.x
  • Alex Jeffrey, Lynn A. Staeheli, Chloé Buir & Vanja Čelebičić (2017). Drinking coffee, rehearsing civility, making subjects. Political Geography, : . DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.09.013
  • Thomas Boré & Craig Young (2017). Artists and creative city policy: Resistance, the mundane and engagement in Stockholm, Sweden. City, Culture and Society, 8: 21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs.2016.05.002
  • Ricarda B. Bouncken & Andreas J. Reuschl (2017). Coworking-Spaces: Chancen für Entrepreneurship und Business Model Design. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 65(3): 151. DOI: 10.3790/zfke.65.3.151
  • Patricia Romeiro (2017). ‘Manobras no Porto’ project (Porto): What can creative activism do for policies and urban place(-making) and the other way around. City, Culture and Society, 8: 27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs.2016.06.001
  • Julie Brown (2017). Curating the “Third Place”? Coworking and the mediation of creativity. Geoforum, 82: 112. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.006
  • Thomas Boré & Craig Young (2013). Getting Creative with the ‘Creative City’? Towards New Perspectives on Creativity in Urban Policy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5): 1799. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01132.x
  • Ilaria Mariotti, Carolina Pacch & Stefano Di Vita (2017). Co-working Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(3): 47. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556
  • Xabier Gainza (2018). Industrial spaces for grassroots creative production: spatial, social and planning facets. European Planning Studies, : 1. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1425377
  • Ricarda B. Bouncke & Andreas J. Reuschl (2018). Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1): 317. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y

    Export in BibTex, RIS or text