Article | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research | The Divergence Hypothesis in Modernization Theory Across Three European Countries: the UK, Sweden and Greece

Title:
The Divergence Hypothesis in Modernization Theory Across Three European Countries: the UK, Sweden and Greece
Author:
Stefania Kalogeraki: The Section for Science and Technology Studies, Gothenburg University, Sweden
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.09110161
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Year:
2009
Volume:
1
Theme:

Other Articles

Pages:
161-178
No. of pages:
18
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2009-06-11


Following a comparative approach it is argued that the modernizing trajectories of three European countries, i.e., the UK, Sweden and Greece were different, as the cultural heritages of the three countries under study, formed by specific historical, political and religious events have acted as a filter of their modernization processes and left an imprint on the prevailing values. England followed a type of modernization associated with “bourgeois revolutions”, Sweden was highly influenced by the popular belief system of solidarity of the political culture of Scandinavian nations and Greece, although increasingly modern, can be associated with a more traditional, top to bottom, version of modernization, highly influenced by the Greek Orthodox Church. Secondary data and empirical research show that the different modernizing paths in the three countries have formed their main cultural characteristics; the UK is portrayed as an individualistic culture,Sweden as an amalgamation of both individualism and collectivism, and Greece as a traditional and more collectivist one. As culture, in the Parsonian approach, acts as the binder of the social world it has functioned as a mediating mechanism, shaping the personality traits and social relationships among British, Swedish and Greek citizens in the direction of an individualistic and/or a collectivist ethos. Whilst the thesis of the article does not support the bipolarity of the “divergence” and “convergence” hypotheses it provides some evidence to the former suggesting that modernization does not always take a simple linear path providing no room for variations.

Keywords: Modernization; divergence hypothesis; individualism; collectivism; Europé

Volume 1, Theme:

Other Articles

, Article 10, 2009
Author:
Stefania Kalogeraki
Title:
The Divergence Hypothesis in Modernization Theory Across Three European Countries: the UK, Sweden and Greece
DOI:
10.3384/cu.2000.1525.09110161
References:
  • Abercrombie, Nicholas. And Alan Warde (2001): The Contemporary British Society Reader, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Arts, Will and Loek Holman (2004): European Values at the Turn of the Millennium, Leiden: Brill.
  • Aspalter, Christian (2001). “Different worlds of welfare capitalism: Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Hong Kong and Singapore. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41752 (September 8, 2008).
  • Barry, Norman (1988): “An individualist’s perspective on marriage and the family”, CIS Policy Report, 37-39.
  • Becker, Gary (1968): “Crime and punishment: An economic approach”, The Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217. [Read this article]
  • Becker, Gary (1991): A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Boekhout van Solinge, Tim (1997): “The Swedish Drug Control System: An in-depth review and analysis”. Available from http://www.cedro-uva.org/lib/boekhout.swedish.pdf (October 28, 2008).
  • Bonoli, Giuliano (1997): “Classifying welfare states: a two-dimension approach”, Journal of Social Policy, 26 (3), 351-72. [Read this article]
  • Brenner, Robert (1977): “The origins of capitalist development: A critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism”, New Left Review, 104, 25-92.
  • British Crime Survey (BCS). (1996): In National Statistics (2003). Home Office. Available from: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/nugget.asp?ID=286&Pos=4&ColRank=2&Rank=192. (September 19, 2008).
  • British Social Attitudes Survey (BSA). (2000): In National Statistics (2003). Home Office. Available from: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/nugget.asp?ID=286&Pos=4&ColRank=2&Rank=192. (September 19, 2008).
  • Daun, Åke (1991): “Individualism and collectivity among Swedes”, Ethnos, 56, 165 -172.
  • —— (1992): “Modern and modest: Mentality and self-stereotypes among Swedes”, in A. Sjoegren and L. Janson (eds): Culture and management, Sweden: Institution for International Business, 101-111.
  • —— (1996): Swedish Mentality,University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Dion, Karen, and Kenneth Dion (1988): “Romantic love: individual and cultural perspectives”, in R. Sternberg and M. Barnes (eds): The psychology of love, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 264-289.
  • Doumanis, Mariella (1983): Mothering in Greece: From Collectivism to Individualism, New York: Academic Press.
  • Dragonas, T. (1983): The self-concept of preadolescents in the Hellenic context, PhD Thesis. University of Aston, Birmingham.
  • Einhorn, Eric and John Logue. (1989): Modern welfare states: politics and policies in Social Democratic Scandinavia, New York : Praeger.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1984): Politics against markets, Princeton: Princeton University
  • ------ (1990): Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gösta and Walter Korpi (1987): “From poor relief to institutional welfarestate: The development of Scandinavian Social Policy”, in: R. Erikson E. Hansen S. Ringen and H. Uusitalo (eds): The Scandinavian model. Welfare states and welfare research, Comparative Public Policy Analysis Series, M.E. Sharpe:Armonk, 39-74.
  • Eurostat: Population and Social Condition. Population. Available from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/ (August 1, 2008).
  • Ferrera, Maurizio (1996): “The Southern model of welfare in social EuropĂ©”, Journal of European Social Policy, 6 (1), 17-37. [Read this article]
  • Flaquer, Llúis (2000): Family Policy and Welfare State in Southern EuropĂ©. Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials, Barcelona, Working Papers No. 185. Available from http://www.diba.es/icps/working_papers/docs/WP_I_185.htm. (July, 9, 2008).
  • Fokas, Effie (2000): “Greek Orthodoxy and European identity”, in A. Mitsos and E. Mossialos, (eds): Contemporary Greece and EuropĂ©. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate,275-300.
  • Georgas, James (1989): “Changing family values in Greece. From collectivist to individualist”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20 (1), 80-91. [Read this article]
  • ------ (1991): “Intrafamily acculturation of values in Greece”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22, 445-447. [Read this article]
  • Georgas, James, Christakopoulou, S., Poortinga, Y., Angleitner, A., Goodwin, R. and Charalambous, N. (1997): “The relationship of family bonds to family structure and function across cultures”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 303-320. [Read this article]
  • Georgiadou, Vassiliki (1995): “Greek Orthodoxy and the politics of nationalism”, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 9 (2), 295–316. [Read this article]
  • Gould, Arthur (1994): “Pollution rituals in Sweden: the pursuit of a drug-free society”, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 3, 85-93. [Read this article]
  • Greenfield, Patricia (2000): “Three approaches to the psychology of culture: where do they come from? Where can they go?”, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 223-240(18).
  • Griswold, Wendy (2004): Cultures and Societies in a Changing World, 2nd Edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1984): The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason, Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Halman, Loek (2001): The European Values Study: A Third Wave, Source Book of the 1999/2000 European Values Study Surveys, Tilburg: EVS, WORC, Tilburg University.
  • Hawdon, James (2005): Drug and alcohol consumption as functions of social structures; a cross-cultural sociology, Lewistown, N.Y.: Mellen Press.
  • Hofstede, Geert (1980): Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
  • ------ (2001): Culture’s Consequences, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hofstede, Geert and Robert McCrae (2004): “Personality and culture revisited: linking traits and dimensions of culture”, Cross-cultural Research, 38: 52-88. Horowitz, Irwing (1966): Three Worlds of Development, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Inglehart, Ronald and Wayne Baker (2000): “Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values”, American Sociological Review, 65, 19-51. [Read this article]
  • Inkeles, Alex and Peter Rossi (1956): “National comparisons of occupational prestige”, American Journal of Sociology, 61, 329-39. [Read this article]
  • Kagitcibasi, Cigdem (1994): “A critical appraisal of individualism and collectivism: toward a new formulation”, in U. Kim H.C. Triandis C. Kagitcibasi S.-C. Choi and G. Yoon (eds): Individualism and collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Thousand Oaks(CA):Sage, 52-65.
  • ------ (1997): “Individualism and collectivism”, in J.W. Berry M.H. Segall and C. Kagitcibasi (eds): Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon,1-49.
  • Katakis, C. (1984): Oi tris tautotites ths ellhnikhs oikogeneias. (The three faces of the Greek family), Athens: Kedros.
  • Kim, Uichol (1994): “Individualism and collectivism: conceptual clarification and elaboration”, in U. Kim H. Triandis C. Kagitcibasi S. -C. Choi and G. Yoon (eds): Individualism and collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Thousand Oaks(CA): Sage,19-40.
  • Kim, Uichol, Triandis, H., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S.-C., and Yoon, G. (1994): Individualism and collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Thousand Oaks (CA):Sage.
  • Kuijsten, Anton C. (1996): “Changing family patterns in EuropĂ©: a case of divergence?”, European Journal of Population, 12, 115 - 143. [Read this article]
  • Leibfried, Stephan (1993): “Towards a European welfare state?”, in C. Jones (ed): New Perspectives on the Welfare State in EuropĂ©, London: Routledge, 135-156.
  • Lenski, Gerhard and Lenski, Jean (1987): Human Societies, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lipset, Seymore and Stein Rokkan, (1967): Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross- National Perspectives, New York: Free Press.
  • Loizos, Peter, and Papataxiarchis, Evthmios (1991): Contested identities: gender and kinship in modern Greece, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Macfarlane, Alan (1987): The Culture of Capitalism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Malefakis, Edward (1995): “The Political and socioeconomic contours of Southern European History”, in R. Gunther P.N. Diamandouros and H.J. Puhle (eds): The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern EuropĂ© in Comparative Perspective, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press,33-76.
  • Markus, Hazel, and Shinobu Kitayama. (1991): “Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation”, Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. [Read this article]
  • Marx, Karl (1973): Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, New York: Vintage Books.
  • McCrae, Robert (2001): “Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons” , Journal of Personality, 69: 819–846. [Read this article]
  • Moore, Barrington, Jr. (1966): Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, Boston: Beacon Press.
  • National Statistics. (2006) : Social Trends (No 36), Available from  http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_social/Social_Trends36/Social_Trends_36.pdf. (June 5, 2008).
  • Odum, Howard T. (1971): Environment, Power, and Society, New York: Wiley.
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2007): Society at a Glance: OECD Social Indicators. Available from www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database (July 11, 2008).
  • Oyserman, Daphna (1993): “The lens of personhood: viewing the self, others, and conflict in a multicultural society”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 993-1009.’ [Read this article]
  • Oyserman, Daphna, Heather M. Coon and Markus Kemmelmeier (2002): “Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses”, Psychological Bulletin, 128 (1),3-72. [Read this article]
  • Parsons, Talcott (1951): The Social System, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Parsons, Talcott, and Edward A. Shils (1962): Toward a general theory of action, New York: Harper and Row.
  • Polanyi, Karl (1957): The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time, Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Polemi-Todoulou, Mina (1981): Cooperation in family and peer group: A study of interdependence in a Greek island community. PhD Thesis. Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA.
  • Pollis, Adamantia (1992): “Greek national identity: religious minorities, rights and European norms”, Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 10, 171–195.
  • Popenoe, David (1985): Private pleasure, public plight: American metropolitan community life in comparative perspective, New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
  • Popenoe, David (1987): “Beyond the nuclear family: a statistical portrait of the changing family in Sweden”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(1),173-183. [Read this article]
  • Prodromou, Elizabeth H. (1996): “Paradigms, power and identity: Rediscovering religion and regionalizing EuropĂ©”, European Journal of Political Research, 30 (2), 125-54. [Read this article]
  • Prokou, Eleni (2003): “International influences on educational policy-with special reference to the technological sector of higher education-in Greece as a European semi-periphery”, Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 33, (3), 301-15.
  • Rhodes, Martin (1996): “South European welfare states: identity, problems and prospects for reform”, South European Society and Politics, 1 (3), 1-22. [Read this article]
  • Ronnby, Alf (1985): Socialstaten, Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Rostow, Walt Whitman (1960): The Stages of Economic Growth, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
  • Schimmack, Ulrich, Phanikiran Radhakrishnan, Shigehiro Oishi, Vivian Dzokoto, and Stephan Ahadi. (2002): “Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life-satisfaction”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 1313–1329. [Read this article]; Pmid:11999925
  • Schimmack, Ulrich, Shigehiro Oishi. And Diener, Ed (2005): “Individualism: A valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1):17-31.
  • Schwartz, Shalom (1990): “Individualism-collectivism: critique and proposed refinements”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139-157. [Read this article]
  • Simmel, Georg (1971): “Group expansion and the development of individuality”, in D.N. Levine (ed): On Individuality and Social Forms, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 251-293.
  • Smith, Adam (1904): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London: Methuen and Co., Ltd.
  • Sotiropoulos, Dimitri A. (2004). Democratization, administrative reform and the state in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain: Is there a ‘model’ of South European bureaucracy? Discussion Paper No. 17.The Hellenic Observatory, LSE. Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/5682/1/Sotiropoulos17.pdf. (June 1, 2008).
  • Stavrou, Theofanis G. (1995): The Orthodox Church and Political Culture in Modern Greece, Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Storry, Mike and Peter Childs (2002): British Cultural Identities, London: Routledge.
  • The World Factbook, (2007). Available from: https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html. (June 7, 2008).
  • Triandis, Harry (1988): “Collectivism vs. Individualism: a reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology”, in G. Verma and C. Bagley (eds): Personality, attitudes and cognition, London: Macmillan, 60-95.
  • Triandis, Harry (1989): “Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism”, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 37, 41-133.
  • —— (1995): Individualism and Collectivism, Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • —— (2001): “Individualism-collectivism and personality”, Journal of Personality, 69, 907-924. [Read this article]; Pmid:11767823
  • Triandis, Harry and Gelfand, M. (1998): “Converging measurements of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism”, Journal of personality and social psychology,74, 118-28. [Read this article]
  • Triandis, Harry et. Al. (1986): “The measurement of the etic aspects of individualism and Collectivism across the cultures”, Australian Journal of Psychology, 38, 257-67. [Read this article]
  • Vandello, Joseph A. and Dov Cohen (1999): “Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 279-292. [Read this article]
  • Weber, Max (1978): Economy and Society, Berkeley : University of California Press.
  • World Development Indicators. (2005): The World Bank Group. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Available from http://web.worldbank.org. (July 7, 2008).
  • Volume 1, Theme::

    Other Articles

    , Article 10, 2009
    Author:
    Stefania Kalogeraki
    Title:
    The Divergence Hypothesis in Modernization Theory Across Three European Countries: the UK, Sweden and Greece
    DOI:
    10.3384/cu.2000.1525.09110161
    Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
    Citations:
  • Maria Fotopoulou, Alison Munr & Avril Taylor (2015). ‘Allowing the right’ and its currency in managing drug stigma in Greece. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26(8): 723. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.005
  • Evdokia Missouridou, Irini Segredou, Despina Esserido & Danai Papadatou (2017). Routine care interventions with the parents of adult drug and alcohol users. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, : 1. DOI: 10.1080/09687637.2017.1399105
  •  

    Export in BibTex, RIS or text